Theory HOL.Divides
section ‹Misc lemmas on division, to be sorted out finally›
theory Divides
imports Parity
begin
class unique_euclidean_semiring_numeral = linordered_euclidean_semiring + discrete_linordered_semidom +
assumes div_less [no_atp]: "0 ≤ a ⟹ a < b ⟹ a div b = 0"
and mod_less [no_atp]: " 0 ≤ a ⟹ a < b ⟹ a mod b = a"
and div_positive [no_atp]: "0 < b ⟹ b ≤ a ⟹ a div b > 0"
and mod_less_eq_dividend [no_atp]: "0 ≤ a ⟹ a mod b ≤ a"
and pos_mod_bound [no_atp]: "0 < b ⟹ a mod b < b"
and pos_mod_sign [no_atp]: "0 < b ⟹ 0 ≤ a mod b"
and mod_mult2_eq [no_atp]: "0 ≤ c ⟹ a mod (b * c) = b * (a div b mod c) + a mod b"
and div_mult2_eq [no_atp]: "0 ≤ c ⟹ a div (b * c) = a div b div c"
hide_fact (open) div_less mod_less div_positive mod_less_eq_dividend pos_mod_bound pos_mod_sign mod_mult2_eq div_mult2_eq
context unique_euclidean_semiring_numeral
begin
context
begin
qualified lemma discrete [no_atp]:
"a < b ⟷ a + 1 ≤ b"
by (fact less_iff_succ_less_eq)
qualified lemma divmod_digit_1 [no_atp]:
assumes "0 ≤ a" "0 < b" and "b ≤ a mod (2 * b)"
shows "2 * (a div (2 * b)) + 1 = a div b" (is "?P")
and "a mod (2 * b) - b = a mod b" (is "?Q")
proof -
from assms mod_less_eq_dividend [of a "2 * b"] have "b ≤ a"
by (auto intro: trans)
with ‹0 < b› have "0 < a div b" by (auto intro: div_positive)
then have [simp]: "1 ≤ a div b" by (simp add: discrete)
with ‹0 < b› have mod_less: "a mod b < b" by (simp add: pos_mod_bound)
define w where "w = a div b mod 2"
then have w_exhaust: "w = 0 ∨ w = 1" by auto
have mod_w: "a mod (2 * b) = a mod b + b * w"
by (simp add: w_def mod_mult2_eq ac_simps)
from assms w_exhaust have "w = 1"
using mod_less by (auto simp add: mod_w)
with mod_w have mod: "a mod (2 * b) = a mod b + b" by simp
have "2 * (a div (2 * b)) = a div b - w"
by (simp add: w_def div_mult2_eq minus_mod_eq_mult_div ac_simps)
with ‹w = 1› have div: "2 * (a div (2 * b)) = a div b - 1" by simp
then show ?P and ?Q
by (simp_all add: div mod add_implies_diff [symmetric])
qed
qualified lemma divmod_digit_0 [no_atp]:
assumes "0 < b" and "a mod (2 * b) < b"
shows "2 * (a div (2 * b)) = a div b" (is "?P")
and "a mod (2 * b) = a mod b" (is "?Q")
proof -
define w where "w = a div b mod 2"
then have w_exhaust: "w = 0 ∨ w = 1" by auto
have mod_w: "a mod (2 * b) = a mod b + b * w"
by (simp add: w_def mod_mult2_eq ac_simps)
moreover have "b ≤ a mod b + b"
proof -
from ‹0 < b› pos_mod_sign have "0 ≤ a mod b" by blast
then have "0 + b ≤ a mod b + b" by (rule add_right_mono)
then show ?thesis by simp
qed
moreover note assms w_exhaust
ultimately have "w = 0" by auto
with mod_w have mod: "a mod (2 * b) = a mod b" by simp
have "2 * (a div (2 * b)) = a div b - w"
by (simp add: w_def div_mult2_eq minus_mod_eq_mult_div ac_simps)
with ‹w = 0› have div: "2 * (a div (2 * b)) = a div b" by simp
then show ?P and ?Q
by (simp_all add: div mod)
qed
qualified lemma mod_double_modulus [no_atp]:
assumes "m > 0" "x ≥ 0"
shows "x mod (2 * m) = x mod m ∨ x mod (2 * m) = x mod m + m"
proof (cases "x mod (2 * m) < m")
case True
thus ?thesis using assms using divmod_digit_0(2)[of m x] by auto
next
case False
hence *: "x mod (2 * m) - m = x mod m"
using assms by (intro divmod_digit_1) auto
hence "x mod (2 * m) = x mod m + m"
by (subst * [symmetric], subst le_add_diff_inverse2) (use False in auto)
thus ?thesis by simp
qed
end
end
instance nat :: unique_euclidean_semiring_numeral
by standard
(auto simp add: div_greater_zero_iff div_mult2_eq mod_mult2_eq)
instance int :: unique_euclidean_semiring_numeral
by standard (auto intro: zmod_le_nonneg_dividend simp add:
pos_imp_zdiv_pos_iff zmod_zmult2_eq zdiv_zmult2_eq)
context
begin
qualified lemma zmod_eq_0D [dest!]: "∃q. m = d * q" if "m mod d = 0" for m d :: int
using that by auto
qualified lemma div_geq [no_atp]: "m div n = Suc ((m - n) div n)" if "0 < n" and " ¬ m < n" for m n :: nat
by (rule le_div_geq) (use that in ‹simp_all add: not_less›)
qualified lemma mod_geq [no_atp]: "m mod n = (m - n) mod n" if "¬ m < n" for m n :: nat
by (rule le_mod_geq) (use that in ‹simp add: not_less›)
qualified lemma mod_eq_0D [no_atp]: "∃q. m = d * q" if "m mod d = 0" for m d :: nat
using that by (auto simp add: mod_eq_0_iff_dvd)
qualified lemma pos_mod_conj [no_atp]: "0 < b ⟹ 0 ≤ a mod b ∧ a mod b < b" for a b :: int
by simp
qualified lemma neg_mod_conj [no_atp]: "b < 0 ⟹ a mod b ≤ 0 ∧ b < a mod b" for a b :: int
by simp
qualified lemma zmod_eq_0_iff [no_atp]: "m mod d = 0 ⟷ (∃q. m = d * q)" for m d :: int
by (auto simp add: mod_eq_0_iff_dvd)
qualified lemma div_positive_int [no_atp]:
"k div l > 0" if "k ≥ l" and "l > 0" for k l :: int
using that by (simp add: nonneg1_imp_zdiv_pos_iff)
end
code_identifier
code_module Divides ⇀ (SML) Arith and (OCaml) Arith and (Haskell) Arith
end