Theory HOL.Basic_BNFs
section ‹Registration of Basic Types as Bounded Natural Functors›
theory Basic_BNFs
imports BNF_Def
begin
inductive_set setl :: "'a + 'b ⇒ 'a set" for s :: "'a + 'b" where
"s = Inl x ⟹ x ∈ setl s"
inductive_set setr :: "'a + 'b ⇒ 'b set" for s :: "'a + 'b" where
"s = Inr x ⟹ x ∈ setr s"
lemma sum_set_defs[code]:
"setl = (λx. case x of Inl z ⇒ {z} | _ ⇒ {})"
"setr = (λx. case x of Inr z ⇒ {z} | _ ⇒ {})"
by (auto simp: fun_eq_iff intro: setl.intros setr.intros elim: setl.cases setr.cases split: sum.splits)
lemma rel_sum_simps[code, simp]:
"rel_sum R1 R2 (Inl a1) (Inl b1) = R1 a1 b1"
"rel_sum R1 R2 (Inl a1) (Inr b2) = False"
"rel_sum R1 R2 (Inr a2) (Inl b1) = False"
"rel_sum R1 R2 (Inr a2) (Inr b2) = R2 a2 b2"
by (auto intro: rel_sum.intros elim: rel_sum.cases)
inductive
pred_sum :: "('a ⇒ bool) ⇒ ('b ⇒ bool) ⇒ 'a + 'b ⇒ bool" for P1 P2
where
"P1 a ⟹ pred_sum P1 P2 (Inl a)"
| "P2 b ⟹ pred_sum P1 P2 (Inr b)"
lemma pred_sum_inject[code, simp]:
"pred_sum P1 P2 (Inl a) ⟷ P1 a"
"pred_sum P1 P2 (Inr b) ⟷ P2 b"
by (simp add: pred_sum.simps)+
bnf "'a + 'b"
map: map_sum
sets: setl setr
bd: natLeq
wits: Inl Inr
rel: rel_sum
pred: pred_sum
proof -
show "map_sum id id = id" by (rule map_sum.id)
next
fix f1 :: "'o ⇒ 's" and f2 :: "'p ⇒ 't" and g1 :: "'s ⇒ 'q" and g2 :: "'t ⇒ 'r"
show "map_sum (g1 ∘ f1) (g2 ∘ f2) = map_sum g1 g2 ∘ map_sum f1 f2"
by (rule map_sum.comp[symmetric])
next
fix x and f1 :: "'o ⇒ 'q" and f2 :: "'p ⇒ 'r" and g1 g2
assume a1: "⋀z. z ∈ setl x ⟹ f1 z = g1 z" and
a2: "⋀z. z ∈ setr x ⟹ f2 z = g2 z"
thus "map_sum f1 f2 x = map_sum g1 g2 x"
proof (cases x)
case Inl thus ?thesis using a1 by (clarsimp simp: sum_set_defs(1))
next
case Inr thus ?thesis using a2 by (clarsimp simp: sum_set_defs(2))
qed
next
fix f1 :: "'o ⇒ 'q" and f2 :: "'p ⇒ 'r"
show "setl ∘ map_sum f1 f2 = image f1 ∘ setl"
by (rule ext, unfold o_apply) (simp add: sum_set_defs(1) split: sum.split)
next
fix f1 :: "'o ⇒ 'q" and f2 :: "'p ⇒ 'r"
show "setr ∘ map_sum f1 f2 = image f2 ∘ setr"
by (rule ext, unfold o_apply) (simp add: sum_set_defs(2) split: sum.split)
next
show "card_order natLeq" by (rule natLeq_card_order)
next
show "cinfinite natLeq" by (rule natLeq_cinfinite)
next
show "regularCard natLeq" by (rule regularCard_natLeq)
next
fix x :: "'o + 'p"
show "|setl x| <o natLeq"
apply (rule finite_iff_ordLess_natLeq[THEN iffD1])
by (simp add: sum_set_defs(1) split: sum.split)
next
fix x :: "'o + 'p"
show "|setr x| <o natLeq"
apply (rule finite_iff_ordLess_natLeq[THEN iffD1])
by (simp add: sum_set_defs(2) split: sum.split)
next
fix R1 R2 S1 S2
show "rel_sum R1 R2 OO rel_sum S1 S2 ≤ rel_sum (R1 OO S1) (R2 OO S2)"
by (force elim: rel_sum.cases)
next
fix R S
show "rel_sum R S = (λx y.
∃z. (setl z ⊆ {(x, y). R x y} ∧ setr z ⊆ {(x, y). S x y}) ∧
map_sum fst fst z = x ∧ map_sum snd snd z = y)"
unfolding sum_set_defs relcompp.simps conversep.simps fun_eq_iff
by (fastforce elim: rel_sum.cases split: sum.splits)
qed (auto simp: sum_set_defs fun_eq_iff pred_sum.simps split: sum.splits)
inductive_set fsts :: "'a × 'b ⇒ 'a set" for p :: "'a × 'b" where
"fst p ∈ fsts p"
inductive_set snds :: "'a × 'b ⇒ 'b set" for p :: "'a × 'b" where
"snd p ∈ snds p"
lemma prod_set_defs[code]: "fsts = (λp. {fst p})" "snds = (λp. {snd p})"
by (auto intro: fsts.intros snds.intros elim: fsts.cases snds.cases)
inductive
rel_prod :: "('a ⇒ 'b ⇒ bool) ⇒ ('c ⇒ 'd ⇒ bool) ⇒ 'a × 'c ⇒ 'b × 'd ⇒ bool" for R1 R2
where
"⟦R1 a b; R2 c d⟧ ⟹ rel_prod R1 R2 (a, c) (b, d)"
inductive
pred_prod :: "('a ⇒ bool) ⇒ ('b ⇒ bool) ⇒ 'a × 'b ⇒ bool" for P1 P2
where
"⟦P1 a; P2 b⟧ ⟹ pred_prod P1 P2 (a, b)"
lemma rel_prod_inject [code, simp]:
"rel_prod R1 R2 (a, b) (c, d) ⟷ R1 a c ∧ R2 b d"
by (auto intro: rel_prod.intros elim: rel_prod.cases)
lemma pred_prod_inject [code, simp]:
"pred_prod P1 P2 (a, b) ⟷ P1 a ∧ P2 b"
by (auto intro: pred_prod.intros elim: pred_prod.cases)
lemma rel_prod_conv:
"rel_prod R1 R2 = (λ(a, b) (c, d). R1 a c ∧ R2 b d)"
by force
definition
pred_fun :: "('a ⇒ bool) ⇒ ('b ⇒ bool) ⇒ ('a ⇒ 'b) ⇒ bool"
where
"pred_fun A B = (λf. ∀x. A x ⟶ B (f x))"
lemma pred_funI: "(⋀x. A x ⟹ B (f x)) ⟹ pred_fun A B f"
unfolding pred_fun_def by simp
bnf "'a × 'b"
map: map_prod
sets: fsts snds
bd: natLeq
rel: rel_prod
pred: pred_prod
proof (unfold prod_set_defs)
show "map_prod id id = id" by (rule map_prod.id)
next
fix f1 f2 g1 g2
show "map_prod (g1 ∘ f1) (g2 ∘ f2) = map_prod g1 g2 ∘ map_prod f1 f2"
by (rule map_prod.comp[symmetric])
next
fix x f1 f2 g1 g2
assume "⋀z. z ∈ {fst x} ⟹ f1 z = g1 z" "⋀z. z ∈ {snd x} ⟹ f2 z = g2 z"
thus "map_prod f1 f2 x = map_prod g1 g2 x" by (cases x) simp
next
fix f1 f2
show "(λx. {fst x}) ∘ map_prod f1 f2 = image f1 ∘ (λx. {fst x})"
by (rule ext, unfold o_apply) simp
next
fix f1 f2
show "(λx. {snd x}) ∘ map_prod f1 f2 = image f2 ∘ (λx. {snd x})"
by (rule ext, unfold o_apply) simp
next
show "card_order natLeq" by (rule natLeq_card_order)
next
show "cinfinite natLeq" by (rule natLeq_cinfinite)
next
show "regularCard natLeq" by (rule regularCard_natLeq)
next
fix x
show "|{fst x}| <o natLeq"
by (simp add: finite_iff_ordLess_natLeq[symmetric])
next
fix x
show "|{snd x}| <o natLeq"
by (simp add: finite_iff_ordLess_natLeq[symmetric])
next
fix R1 R2 S1 S2
show "rel_prod R1 R2 OO rel_prod S1 S2 ≤ rel_prod (R1 OO S1) (R2 OO S2)" by auto
next
fix R S
show "rel_prod R S = (λx y.
∃z. ({fst z} ⊆ {(x, y). R x y} ∧ {snd z} ⊆ {(x, y). S x y}) ∧
map_prod fst fst z = x ∧ map_prod snd snd z = y)"
unfolding prod_set_defs rel_prod_inject relcompp.simps conversep.simps fun_eq_iff
by auto
qed auto
lemma card_order_bd_fun: "card_order (natLeq +c card_suc ( |UNIV| ))"
by (auto simp: card_order_csum natLeq_card_order card_order_card_suc card_of_card_order_on)
lemma Cinfinite_bd_fun: "Cinfinite (natLeq +c card_suc ( |UNIV| ))"
by (auto simp: Cinfinite_csum natLeq_Cinfinite)
lemma regularCard_bd_fun: "regularCard (natLeq +c card_suc ( |UNIV| ))"
(is "regularCard (_ +c card_suc ?U)")
proof (cases "Cinfinite ?U")
case True
then show ?thesis
by (intro regularCard_csum natLeq_Cinfinite Cinfinite_card_suc
card_of_card_order_on regularCard_natLeq regularCard_card_suc)
next
case False
then have "card_suc ?U ≤o natLeq"
unfolding cinfinite_def Field_card_of
by (intro card_suc_least;
simp add: natLeq_Card_order card_of_card_order_on flip: finite_iff_ordLess_natLeq)
then have "natLeq =o natLeq +c card_suc ?U"
using natLeq_Cinfinite csum_absorb1 ordIso_symmetric by blast
then show ?thesis
by (intro regularCard_ordIso[OF _ natLeq_Cinfinite regularCard_natLeq])
qed
lemma ordLess_bd_fun: "|UNIV::'a set| <o natLeq +c card_suc ( |UNIV::'a set| )"
(is "_ <o (_ +c card_suc (?U :: 'a rel))")
proof (cases "Cinfinite ?U")
case True
have "?U <o card_suc ?U" using card_of_card_order_on natLeq_card_order card_suc_greater by blast
also have "card_suc ?U =o natLeq +c card_suc ?U" by (rule csum_absorb2[THEN ordIso_symmetric])
(auto simp: True card_of_card_order_on intro!: Cinfinite_card_suc natLeq_ordLeq_cinfinite)
finally show ?thesis .
next
case False
then have "?U <o natLeq"
by (auto simp: cinfinite_def Field_card_of card_of_card_order_on finite_iff_ordLess_natLeq[symmetric])
then show ?thesis
by (rule ordLess_ordLeq_trans[OF _ ordLeq_csum1[OF natLeq_Card_order]])
qed
bnf "'a ⇒ 'b"
map: "(∘)"
sets: range
bd: "natLeq +c card_suc ( |UNIV::'a set| )"
rel: "rel_fun (=)"
pred: "pred_fun (λ_. True)"
proof
fix f show "id ∘ f = id f" by simp
next
fix f g show "(∘) (g ∘ f) = (∘) g ∘ (∘) f"
unfolding comp_def[abs_def] ..
next
fix x f g
assume "⋀z. z ∈ range x ⟹ f z = g z"
thus "f ∘ x = g ∘ x" by auto
next
fix f show "range ∘ (∘) f = (`) f ∘ range"
by (auto simp add: fun_eq_iff)
next
show "card_order (natLeq +c card_suc ( |UNIV| ))"
by (rule card_order_bd_fun)
next
show "cinfinite (natLeq +c card_suc ( |UNIV| ))"
by (rule Cinfinite_bd_fun[THEN conjunct1])
next
show "regularCard (natLeq +c card_suc ( |UNIV| ))"
by (rule regularCard_bd_fun)
next
fix f :: "'d ⇒ 'a"
show "|range f| <o natLeq +c card_suc |UNIV :: 'd set|"
by (rule ordLeq_ordLess_trans[OF card_of_image ordLess_bd_fun])
next
fix R S
show "rel_fun (=) R OO rel_fun (=) S ≤ rel_fun (=) (R OO S)" by (auto simp: rel_fun_def)
next
fix R
show "rel_fun (=) R = (λx y.
∃z. range z ⊆ {(x, y). R x y} ∧ fst ∘ z = x ∧ snd ∘ z = y)"
unfolding rel_fun_def subset_iff by (force simp: fun_eq_iff[symmetric])
qed (auto simp: pred_fun_def)
end